by Patrick Devlin

In a truly landmark ruling that challenges the assumptions of law enforcement officials and prosecutors across America regarding the ephemeral notion of personal privacy, which has been under an aggressive unison attack by both local law enforcers and national security state enlargers who have suggested that Americans should have absolutely no expectation of the right of personal privacy, the US Supreme Court agreed in a unanimous decision that police are required to obtain a court order before searching the contents of a citizen’s cell phone or smart phone.

The ruling resolved two cases where suspects were convicted after police accessed information; including photos, contact information, text messages and the call histories of the arrestees without seeking a warrant to perform the searches.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the opinion for the court, stated, “We cannot deny that our decision today will have an impact on the ability of law enforcement to combat crime,” because, Roberts reminded, “Privacy comes with a cost.”

The court ruled that arresting officers can examine an arrestee’s cell phone “to ensure that it will not be used as a weapon,” but they cannot examine the contents of arrestees’ cell phones without first convincing a judge that further examination is warranted. The justices said that once officers secure the cell phones of arrestees, the “data on the phone can endanger no one.”

Roberts suggested in his decision that the court was obliged to establish a bright-line ruling on the matter of warrantless searches of Americans’ cell phones and smart phones due to the proliferation of the devices and the technological advances that have resulted in such phones being the single largest repository of personal information that citizens own.